I think that parents should be able to hit their children for three reasons. My first reason is that children tend to disrespect their parents. Parents feel the need to hit them because they are being inappropriate and rude. If someone is being rude to their parents then the parents are going to hit them because that is their first instinct and children should not be rude. Most of the time hitting your child can make your child behavior improve.
My second reason is that parents gave birth to their child or children, so they should have the right to hit them because the child is theirs. If something is yours then you should have the right to treat it the way you want.
Last parents should be able to hit their child to a certain extent because hitting your child can result in suicide, running away, or even killing their parents because they have hit them. Child abuse is something that parents should really think about because hitting your child with a broom, pole, or a wire can result in something deadly. Even killing you………..
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
Should Huckleberry Finn be taught in school?
In my opinion I feel as though Huckleberry Finn should be taught in school to inform students about how people used to talk back in the days and how they were not as smart as the generation today. The book says a lot of racist words and uses profanity but overall the book is good to read. We can now get a vision on how the past was and how uneducated they were.
Friday, November 2, 2007
Pog 2
Shaquille
Davenport
11/2/07
In my opinion I think that the Constitution does not resolve conflict because the Constitution helps the citizens, it protects our rights and it also keep the world from danger. Without out it then I don’t know where I will be as a young black male or if the world will be at peace.
In this simulation I believe that security goal is more important because we need security amongst us all and our rights of the Constitution. If we did not have security then then anyone or anything will have the right to hurt or put your life in danger. But since we have security then that person can still hurt you but they will get their consequences such as imprisonment. This goal was achieved because as a citizen of the United States everyone needs security that will defend him or her in his or her time of need.
The powers that the Constitution established for this type of problem are in Article 1,4, and 9. It states that the government and other people cannot invade our privacy. In our group the executive we talked about a lot of things but our main topic was the I-chip. The president vetoed a bill because he disapproved an amendment. What I’m trying to get to is that the Constitution is not a bad thing. If the president does not like an amendment that someone is bringing to hi then he/she has the right to veto it.
The separation of powers and checks and balances were used under the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government because it was used to prevent abuse of power. This US form of separation of powers is known as ‘’checks and balances.’’ Under this mode, the state is divided into branches, and each branch of the state has separate and independent powers of and areas of responsibility.
To sum up this essay, the Constitution was effective in finding a balance between security and freedom. In this world that we all live in we have security that will defend us in our time in need. If we did not have the police that is enforced in our neighborhood our the entire country then I don’t know if this world would still be in the shape it is in now. Also, we still have freedom because there are not anymore slaves that I know of right now. Our rights and our privacy are secured and we have the right to do and say what ever we wan t but it depends on our actions if we end up in jail or not.
Davenport
11/2/07
In my opinion I think that the Constitution does not resolve conflict because the Constitution helps the citizens, it protects our rights and it also keep the world from danger. Without out it then I don’t know where I will be as a young black male or if the world will be at peace.
In this simulation I believe that security goal is more important because we need security amongst us all and our rights of the Constitution. If we did not have security then then anyone or anything will have the right to hurt or put your life in danger. But since we have security then that person can still hurt you but they will get their consequences such as imprisonment. This goal was achieved because as a citizen of the United States everyone needs security that will defend him or her in his or her time of need.
The powers that the Constitution established for this type of problem are in Article 1,4, and 9. It states that the government and other people cannot invade our privacy. In our group the executive we talked about a lot of things but our main topic was the I-chip. The president vetoed a bill because he disapproved an amendment. What I’m trying to get to is that the Constitution is not a bad thing. If the president does not like an amendment that someone is bringing to hi then he/she has the right to veto it.
The separation of powers and checks and balances were used under the legislative, executive, and judicial branches of government because it was used to prevent abuse of power. This US form of separation of powers is known as ‘’checks and balances.’’ Under this mode, the state is divided into branches, and each branch of the state has separate and independent powers of and areas of responsibility.
To sum up this essay, the Constitution was effective in finding a balance between security and freedom. In this world that we all live in we have security that will defend us in our time in need. If we did not have the police that is enforced in our neighborhood our the entire country then I don’t know if this world would still be in the shape it is in now. Also, we still have freedom because there are not anymore slaves that I know of right now. Our rights and our privacy are secured and we have the right to do and say what ever we wan t but it depends on our actions if we end up in jail or not.
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
i lOOk bEtTeR tHaN U RiGhT
Thursday, October 11, 2007
Internet freedom vs society
I think that facebook is open and myspace is not because myspace is very dangerous. I think that because the school computers are equipped with alot of things like the camera and other technology. The school and staff doesn't want our lives in danger do to the fact that we were on myspace talking to people. I think that was a great idea to block myspace because I kow the school doesn't want to get in trouble and if someone was to talk to someone and get raped or snatched up then the student wouldn't be on the school computer then the school would take the blame.
Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Thursday, October 4, 2007
Philosophy of gobernment
I think government should be necessary. I feel this way because we need someone to look over the world and the people in it. Without government there would be no rules and the world would be chaotic.
Philosophy of govermnent
I think that goverment is necessary. I feel this way because we need someone to look over our world and the people in it. Without government there would be no rules and no rules would be chaotic because everyone would go bananas.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)